Case report
Published in spanish Científica Dental Vol. 21. Nº 2. 2024
www.cientificadental.es
Surgical and restorative management of a dental implant in the esthetic zone and volumetric evaluation following deepithelialized connective tissue graft: a case report
Introduction (basis and objectives): After tooth extraction, changes occur in the soft tissues associated with bone resorption in a vertical and horizontal direction. This collapse can be addressed through bone grafts and connective tissue grafts. The objective of this clinical case is to describe the treatment sequence carried out from extraction to delivery of the definitive crown, combining regenerative, guided surgery, mucogingival and prosthetic concepts. Furthermore, changes in vestibular mucosal thickness that occurred after the use of a connective tissue graft are described and analyzed using digital analysis software.
Methods: The surgical sequence consisted of performing alveolar preservation. After 4 months, a guided implant was planned and placed in position 1.2 with simultaneous connective tissue graft. After integration, the soft tissues were conditioned with a provisional crown and then the definitive screw-retained restoration was placed.
Results: The guided implant placement approach and application of a connective tissue graft showed aesthetic results and significant soft tissue volumetric gains.
Conclusions: Careful management of hard and soft tissues, as well as planning through guided surgery, increases precision regarding the ideal position of the implant, which will impact the long-term stability of hard and soft tissues.
Key words: Surgery; Computer-Assisted; Dental implants; Soft tissue; Connective tissue; Software tool.
In the field of implantology, digital technology has emerged as an advancement to enhance surgical procedures and achieve high-quality treatments with aesthetic outcomes. In this context, guided surgery, introduced in the 1990s, is regarded as a contemporary dental practice based on digital planning and the utilisation of advanced imaging technologies1. Implant placement is performed using 3D-printed surgical guides and a specific kit designed for each system2. Compared with the conventional technique, guided implant placement has been demonstrated to significantly optimise safety, minimise injury to adjacent anatomical structures, and reduce surgical time as well as intra- and postoperative morbidity3–5. However, guided surgery requires a financial investment, more meticulous advance planning, and a professional with broader experience for its appropriate management2,6.
There is no doubt that the aesthetic outcome of treatment with implants in the anterior maxillary region is of great importance. For this purpose, it is essential to have adequate peri-implant tissue support, encompassing both hard and soft tissues. Each professional must assume responsibility for improving the phenotype of peri-implant soft tissues, focusing on three main components: gingival thickness, width of keratinised mucosa, and supracrestal tissue height7,8. Current research recognises soft tissue augmentation procedures as essential interventions. They not only enhance stability at the bone level but also control inflammatory signs and prevent future aesthetic complications7,9–11.
Over the past decade, the quantitative evaluation of augmented tissues has primarily relied on clinical methods such as the periodontal probe and endodontic files. However, the analogue instruments employed lack three-dimensional accuracy for the precise assessment of volumetric changes12. Consequently, the utilisation of digital technologies such as computed tomography, ultrasound, and three-dimensional analysis of STL (Standard Tessellation Language) files derived from the digitisation of plaster models or intraoral scanning is advantageous13–15. These digital and computerised tools offer significant advantages in dental diagnosis, planning, and treatment. Thus, they provide non-invasive and comfortable measurements for patients, greater accuracy in 2D and 3D evaluations (achieving a precision of 0.01 mm), and enable long-term monitoring by analysing changes occurring in the tissues16,17.
The objective of this clinical case is to present a treatment sequence in a clinical scenario where anatomical and restorative conditions precluded the placement of an immediate implant in the aesthetic sector. Furthermore, to describe and evaluate, using a non-invasive technique and three-dimensional analysis software, the volumetric changes of the soft tissue following the placement of a connective tissue graft on the buccal and occlusal aspects of the implant.
Vercruyssen M, Laleman I, Jacobs R, et al. Computer-supported implant planning and guided surgery: a narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(S11):69- 76.
Tatakis DN, Chien HH, Parashis AO. Guided implant surgery risks and their prevention. Periodontol 2000. 2019;81(1):194-208.
Pimkhaokham A, Jiaranuchart S, Kaboosaya B, et al. Can computer- assisted implant surgery improve clinical outcomes and reduce the frequency and intensity of complications in implant dentistry? A critical review. Periodontol 2000. 2022;90(1):197-223.
Apostolakis D, Brown JE. The anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve: prevalence, measurement of its length and a recommendation for interforaminal implant installation based on cone beam CT imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(9):1022-1030.
Romandini M, Ruales-Carrera E, Sadilina S, et al. Minimal invasiveness at dental implant placement: A systematic review with meta-analyses on flapless fully guided surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2023;91(1):89-112.
Chackartchi T, Romanos GE, Parkanyi L, et al. Reducing errors in guided implant surgery to optimize treatment outcomes. Periodontol 2000. 2022;88(1):64-72.
Ávila G, González O, Couso E, et al. The peri-implant phenotype. J Periodontol. 2020;91(3):283-288.
Monje A, González O, Ávila G. Impact of peri-implant soft tissue characteristics on health and esthetics. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(1):183-196.
Thoma DS, Gasser TJW, Hämmerle CHF, et al. Soft tissue augmentation with a volume-stable collagen matrix or an autogenous connective tissue graft at implant sites: Five-year results of a randomized controlled trial post implant loading. J Periodontol. 2023;94(2):230- 243.
Thoma DS, Strauss FJ, Mancini L, et al. Minimal invasiveness in soft tissue augmentation at dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcome measures. Periodontol 2000. 2023;91(1):182-198.
Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Ávila G, et al. Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri- implant health: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2021;92(1):21-44.
Ávila G, Couso E, Pirc M, et al. Outcome measures and methods of assessment of soft tissue augmentation interventions in the context of dental implant therapy: A systematic review of clinical studies published in the last 10 years. J Clin Periodontol. 2023;50(S25):83-95.
Wismeijer D, Joda T, Flügge T, et al. Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Digital technologies. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(S16):436-442.
Fan S, Sáenz-Ravello G, Al-Nawas B, et al. The feasibility of ultrasonography for the measurement of periodontal and peri-implant phenotype: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023;25(5):892-909.
Pirc M, Harbeck O, Sapata VM, et al. Contour changes of peri-implant tissues are minimal and similar for a one- and a two-piece implant system over 12 years. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(2):719-727.
Strauss FJ, Gil A, Smirani R, et al. The use of digital technologies in peri-implant soft tissue augmentation – A narrative review on planning, measurements, monitoring and aesthetics. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 (2). doi:10.1111/ clr.14238.
Fernandes D, Marques T, Borges T, et al. Volumetric analysis on the use of customized healing abutments with or without connective tissue graft at flapless maxillary immediate implant placement: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023;34(9):934- 946.
Zucchelli G, Mele M, Stefanini M, et al. Patient morbidity and root coverage outcome after subepithelial connective tissue and de-epithelialized grafts: a comparative randomized-controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(8):728-738.
González D, Cabello G, Olmos G, et al. The saddle connective tissue graft: a periodontal plastic surgery technique to obtain soft tissue coronal gain on immediate implants. A case report. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015;10(3):444-455.
Araújo MG, da Silva JCC, de Mendonça AF, et al. Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(4):407-412.
Sanz M, Lindhe J, Alcaraz J, Sanz- Sanchez I, et al. The effect of placing a bone replacement graft in the gap at immediately placed implants: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(8):902-910.
Pichotano EC, de Molon RS, Freitas de Paula LG, et al. Early Placement of Dental Implants in Maxillary Sinus Grafted With Leukocyte and Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral. J Oral Implantol. 2018;44(3):199-206.
Sharma S, Thakur SL, Joshi SK, et al. Measurement of gingival thickness using digital vernier caliper and ultrasonographic method: a comparative study. J Investig Clin Dent. 2014;5(2):138-143.
Lee CT, Tao CY, Stoupel J. The Effect of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Placement on Esthetic Outcomes After Immediate Implant Placement: Systematic Review. J
Frizzera F, de Freitas RM, Muñoz- Chávez OF, et al. Impact of Soft Tissue Grafts to Reduce Peri-implant Alterations After Immediate Implant Placement and Provisionalization in Compromised Sockets. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019;39(3):381-389.
Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NHM. Soft tissue changes after connective tissue grafts around immediately placed and restored dental implants in the esthetic zone: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent Off Publ Am Acad Esthet Dent Al. 2020;32(3):280-290.
Thoma DS, Gasser TJW, Jung RE, et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing implant sites augmented with a volume-stable collagen matrix or an autogenous connective tissue graft: 3-year data after insertion of reconstructions. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47(5):630-639.
Raico Gallardo YN, da Silva-Olivio IRT, Mukai E, et al. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(5):602-612.
Gargallo J, Barootchi S, Salomó O, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review. Ann Anat – Anat Anz. 2019;225:1-10.
D’haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, et al. Current state of the art of computer- guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):121-133.
Smitkarn P, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N, et al. The accuracy of single-tooth implants placed using fully digital-guided surgery and freehand implant surgery. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(9):949-957.
Tattan M, Chambrone L, González- Martín O, et al. Static computer-aided, partially guided, and free-handed implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(10):889-916.
Quispe N, Flores J, Pardal B, et al. Factors Influencing the Accuracy of Guided Surgery: An In Vitro Trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023;38(1):120-129.

Quispe López, Norberto
Associate Lecturer, Department of Surgery, Stomatology Area, University of Salamanca (USAL).
Dahdouh, Manar
5th-year Dentistry student, University of Salamanca.
Ledesma Sánchez, Lucía
5th-year Dentistry student, University of Salamanca.
Rodríguez Muñoz, Pablo
4th-year Dentistry student, University of Salamanca.









