Ir al contenido principal

Clinical case

Published in spanish Científica Dental Vol. 17. Nº 2. 2020 www.cientificadental.es

Digital flow in unitary dental implants rehabilitation in anterior sector. Surgical and prosthetic planning. Case report

Resumen

Aim: The purpose of this article is to present a clinical case of high aesthetic demand. Such planning and treat with digital flow, included diagnosis, prosthetic planning and finally, the placement of the final prosthesis.

Case report: A 52-year-old woman presents a fracture of the tooth 2.1. After diagnosis and analysis both clinically and radiographically, an impossible restorative prognosis is determined for 2.1, planning implant-supported rehabilitation as treatment. A scan of the area to be treated was carried out to carry out a detailed study of the case and the preparation of a provisional crown, which was screwed at the same time of surgery to an implant placed immediately post-extraction. Besides, hard and soft tissue graft were placed to guarantee the maintenance of the peri-implant contours. After the implant osteointegration, the contour of the provisional crown was scanned to obtain a suitable emergence profile and gingival tissue volume. Both the emergency profile obtained and the contour of the provisional were scanned together with the position of the implant for the preparation of the final metalceramic restoration. After six months, it can observe an ideal soft tissue aesthetic and perfect maintenance of the entire gingival architecture.

Conclusion: The management of the anterior superior aesthetic sector shows a clear aesthetic demand. In cases of tooth loss at this location, fixed implant rehabilitation is the treatment of choice. However, to achieve an adequate and predictable result, proper surgical and prosthetic management is essential. Digital flow it present like alternative and a quality leap in the therapeutic approach to these cases, a more accurate and individualized treatment, and the information that is transferred to the prosthetic laboratory is more simple and efficient.

Abstract
Este artículo está exclusivamente disponible para su descarga en PDF. | 03/29/2024
Palabras clave
Dental implant, Digital dentistry, Immediate loading, Post-extraction implant, Soft tissue
Introducción

After the loss of a tooth, a series of physiological processes takes place throughout the dento-alveolar complex that culminates in atrophy and collapse of both the bone and gum tissues, with a horizontal and vertical component. This can have a significant repercussion aesthetically for patients when it affects the anterosuperior aesthetic sector1-. Following advances in rehabilitation of osseointegrated implants (OII), aimed at achieving greater primary stability in post-extraction sockets and allowing a reduction in integration times, new treatment protocols have emerged that can focus rehabilitation on aesthetic sectors much more efficiently. These protocols are based mainly on immediate placement of the screw-retained provisional crowns at the same time during surgery. This allows for the preservation and management of soft and hard tissue grafts and emergency profiles; thus preventing their collapse and giving the patient immediate aesthetic benefit4-6.

Nowadays, digital workflow is increasingly integrating itself in practically all dentistry fields, although its application in oral rehabilitation and cosmetic dentistry is especially important. Implants can be planned following advances in technologies and the use of intraoral scanners and software programs. These digital programs can be used to design the case by computer, analyse the patient photographic study and make virtual study models to improve case planning; thus reducing treatment times and, in the long run, their costs, with respect to traditional methods7, 8.

Digital planning as part of implant rehabilitation is a tool for optimising results and improving surgical planning, which is prosthetically guided from the outset and can lead to more exact handling of peri-implant tissues, thanks to scanning the emergence profiles obtained, and making definitive restorations of great aesthetic quality7, 8.

The objective of this article is to describe the rehabilitation on implants in a high aesthetic demand case, with the treatment based entirely on digital planning.

Bibliografía
1

Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32 (2): 212-8.

2

Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32 (6): 645-52.

3

Araújo MG, da Silva JCC, de Mendonça AF, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26 (4): 407-412.

4

Higginbottom F, Belser R, D. Jones J, E. Keith S. Prosthetic management of implants the esthetic zone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 62-72.

5

Al-Sabbagh M. Implants in the Esthetic Zone. Dent Clin North Am 2006; 50: 391–407.

6

Buser et al. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 43-61.

7

Joda T, Brägger U, Gallucci G. Systematic literature review of digital threedimensional superimposition techniques to create virtual dental patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015; 30: 330-7.

8

Stapleton BM, Lin WS, Ntounis A, Harris BT, Morton D. Application of digital diagnostic impression, virtual planning, and computer-guided implant surgery for a CAD/CAM-fabricated, implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 402-8.

9

Santos D, Valenzuela F, Morrow B, Pameijer C, Garcia-Godoy F.Effect of Ferrule Location With Varying Heights on Fracture Resistance and Failure Mode of Restored Endodontically Treated Maxillary Incisors. J Prosthodont 2019; 28 (6): 677-683.

10

Kan JY, Roe P, Rungcharassaeng K, Patel RD, Waki T, Lozada JL, Zimmerman G. Classification of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary osseous housing for immediate implant placement: a cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26 (4): 873-6.

11

Elian N, Cho SC, Froum S, Smith RB, Tarnow DP. A simplified socket classification and repair technique. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2007; 19 (2): 99-104.

12

Gallucci G,Bernard J, Med P, Bertosa M, Berlser U. Immediate Loading with Fixed Scre-Retained Provisional Restorations in Edentulous Jaws: The Pickup Technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 524-533.

13

Su H, Gonzalez-Martin O, Weisgold A, Lee E. Considerations of implant abutment and crown contour: critical contour and subcritical contour. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010; 30 (4): 335-43.

14

Fu JH, Lee A, Wang HL. Influence of tissue biotype on implant esthetics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26 (3): 499-508.

15

Tatakis DN, Chambrone L, Allen EP y cols. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol 2000 2016; 86 (2 Suppl): S52-5.

16

Sanz M, Lindhe J, Alcaraz J, Sanz-Sanchez I, Cecchinato D. The effect of placing a bone replacement graft in the gap at immediately placed implants: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Impl Res 2016; 28: 1-9.

17

Hinds KF. Custom impression coping for an exact registration of the healed tissue in the esthetic implant restoration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997 Dec; 17(6): 584-91.

18

Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981; 10: 387-416.

19

Brånemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 399-410.

20

Joda T, Brägger U. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/ time analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res 2015; 26: 1430-5.

21

Pacifici L, Pacifici A. Digital flow in medicine and dentistry: what’s new? J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2018; 32 (4): 1027- 1031.

22

Wismeijer D, Mans R, van Genuchten M, Reijers HA. Patients’ preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 1113-8.

23

Joda T, Brägger U. Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27(12): e185-e189.

24

Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, Chen S. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? Periodontol 2000 2017; 73 (1): 84-102.

25

Joda T, Gallucci GO. The virtual patient in dental medicine. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 725-6.

26

Arunyanak SP, Harris BT, Grant GT, Morton D, Lin WS. Digital approach to planning computer-guided surgery and immediate provisionalization in a partially edentulous patient. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116: 8-14.